LG E9 4K OLED smart TV review: The real deal gets brighter

LG’s E9 series of OLED smart TVs—we review the 65-inch model OLED65E9PUA here—is a story of incremental improvements. When you’re arguably already the best, that’s usually all that’s required. In this case we’re talking about 90 nits of additional peak brightness, and relatively modest tweaks to the processing and user interface. Earthshaking changes they’re not, but LG’s top-of-the-line OLED TVs were already great.

Design and features

The E9 uses the same basic design as last year’s model, featuring a glass front bezel that extends beyond the screen to rest on whatever surface you set the TV on. Assuming you don’t wall mount it using the 300mm x 200mm VESA mount point, that is. A large counterweight attaches the bottom of the TV and holds it upright with a slight backwards rake.

The 65-inch E9 I tested measures 57 inches wide, 34.5 inches high, and 2 inches deep, not counting the approximately 30-pound counterweight. Total weight is 70 pounds, but you’re only hefting 44 pounds to get the TV upright. MSRP for the 65-incher is $4,300, and a 55-inch model is available for $3,300.

I/O ports includes four HDMI, three of which are side-facing (with ARC and eARC supported on HDMI 2); three USB 2.0 ports (one side facing); a coax connector; composite AV; ethernet; a 3.5mm jack for RS-232C control; and an optical S/PDIF output.

2019 oled65e9pua 7 LG

The E9’s side ports are hidden under a removable panel cover to the right of the rear-facing ports. You won’t see the seams even if you click and enlarge. It’s there, trust me.

Wireless communications are via 802.11ac Wi-Fi and Bluetooth 5.0. The E9 has Google Assistant onboard, and Alexa is coming via a firmware upgrade. Dolby Vision, HDR10, and HLG high dynamic range are supported, but HDR10+ is not. Most material is broadcast in multiple formats, so the lack of the latter is not an impediment.

There’s support for Dolby Atmos and DTS-HD, plus WiSA (Wireless Stereo Audio) streaming, although the latter requires an optional dongle. That will set you back around $80. 

Improvements for 2019

While LG’s E8 series generated approximately 700 nits of peak brightness, I measured 790 nits from the E9. That means it can do a bit better in terms of overall detail as well as making HDR pop a bit more. To the eye, the difference is hardly drastic.

LG has added HDR and SDR Technicolor Expert Modes for calibration junkies and professionals, and the company is now doubling down with two passes by the de-banding algorithm. An improved automatic tone-mapping algorithm has also been added, and the lag in gaming mode has been reduced.

LG’s 48-inch OLEDs are coming in 2020

Can’t fit an enormous OLED TV in your living room? It looks like LG’s smaller 48-inch OLED panel could be launching as soon as next year.

We reported back in March that LG was planning a smaller, more compact OLED model to compete with mid-range LCD TVs, but still hadn’t heard much in terms of when that might be. 

On a press tour in China however, LG vice president Oh Chang-ho confirmed that the 48-inch size was planned for release at some point in 2020 (via Korean newspaper The Elec).

Oh Chang-ho said: “It’s a strategy to solidify our footing in the high-end TV market, while continuing to have presence in the standard and premium segments.”

OLED is increasingly being embraced as the TV technology of the moment, with the likes of LG, Sony, Philips and Hisense all using OLED panels for their premium televisions. But if you want an OLED TV that can fit into smaller living rooms or even bedrooms, you can’t currently buy one that’s smaller than 55 inches.

Gearing up

OLED TV production is still quite limited compared to LCDs, given how new the technology is to the market, with production lines only currently set up for 55-inch, 65-inch, 77-inch, and recently even 88-inch models (the LG 8K OLED).

It’s also technically difficult to cram all those 4K pixels into a smaller OLED panel, with a 91.8 pixel density (pixels per inch) needed for a 48-inch panel.

Downsizing to a 48-inch model may not seem like a huge jump for viewers, but it offers a smaller form factor for those who can’t squeeze a 55-inch TV into their homes – and will also offer a cheaper entry point to OLED than LG’s current ‘budget’ option, the £1,199 / $1,499 / AU$2,999 LG B8 OLED

We’ll keep you updated as soon as we have an idea of pricing, but if the new set manages to undercut the £1,000 / $1,000 mark, we could have a real winner on our hands.

Via FlatpanelsHD

Go to Source

Oppo renders remind us that foldable phones are still a ‘thing’

It’s been a long time since we last heard news about foldable phones, either in terms of real handsets or prospective ones in the form of leaks and renders – but some new images have popped up to remind us of this once-exciting form factor.

Recently-published renders of a phone from Oppo, included as part of a filing to the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), and spotted by LetsGoDigital, show a folding phone with features like a pop-up camera and 3.5mm headphone jack.

The renders themselves are nothing special – their features are novel, for sure, but patents don’t always result in actual phones, and these images show a very rough idea of the phone. However the publication of the renders at this time, now the foldable phone hype has died down, is an intriguing reminder of this kind of phone.

What happened to foldables?

When we were shown the Samsung Galaxy Fold and Huawei Mate X in February and March, it seemed foldable devices like these were going to become the new big ‘thing’ – patents and renders for folding phones from companies like Google and Apple  started popping up left right and center. 

After it was discovered the Galaxy Fold had a durability problem, the hype died down, and we haven’t heard much on foldable phones for a while.

Perhaps companies are watching Samsung to see how it deals with the Galaxy Fold, which still doesn’t have a solid release date, or maybe many are souring on the idea of flexible handsets.

On top of that, the recent Huawei ban means the fate of the Huawei Mate X is uncertain – that and the Galaxy Fold were the only two real foldables that we’d gotten hands-on with and new release windows for, but now we’ve no idea when the first device could release.

The wild form factor of bending handsets may be futuristic and intriguing, but it’s also uncertain – while Oppo’s filing reminds us foldables exist, it doesn’t make them any closer to being in our hands.

Go to Source

What it takes to achieve automotive’s “Vision Zero”

About the author

Chris Jacobs joined ADI in 1995. During his tenure at Analog Devices, Jacobs has held a number of design engineering, design management, and business leadership positions in the Consumer, Communications, Industrial and Automotive teams. Chris Jacobs is currently the Vice President of the Autonomous Transportation & Automotive Safety business unit at Analog Devices. Prior to this, Jacobs was the General Manager of Automotive Safety, Product and Technology Director of Precision Converters and the Product Line Director of High Speed Converters & Isolation Products. 

Traditional driving may soon be viewed as archaic. There is a disruptive evolution taking place from human-steered vehicles to autonomous vehicles requiring a holistic ecosystem to spur development and create a monumental, structural transformation of a high percentage of the global economy. Still, safety remains a paramount hurdle for this ecosystem to clear before the driverless existence becomes true reality. 

More than 3,000 road crash deaths occur worldwide daily. Removing humans from the equation is one way to address this, and as a result, technology providers, Tier-1 suppliers, original equipment manufacturers (OEM), and automakers are embracing new business models and making big bets to accelerate the maturation of key autonomous driving technologies. The aim is to achieve Vision Zero, the goal of no loss of life caused by vehicles, for autonomous deployment hopes to reach their fullest potential.

Core sensor technologies help attain higher-level vehicle autonomy 

Vehicle intelligence is typically expressed as Autonomy Levels. Levels 1 and 2 are largely warning systems, where at Level 3 and above, the vehicle can act to avoid accidents. As the vehicle advances to Level 5, the steering wheel is removed, and the car operates fully on its own. In these first few system generations, as vehicles start to take on Level 2 functionality, sensor systems operate independently. To reach fully cognitive autonomous vehicles, the number of sensors rise significantly. Their performance and response times also need to vastly improve. 

Vehicles with more external sensors can become more fully aware of their surroundings and prove safer as a result. Technologies critical in AI systems capable of navigating an autonomous vehicle include cameras, LiDAR, RADAR, microelectromechanical systems (Inertial MEMS), ultrasound and GPS. Along with supporting an autonomous vehicle’s perception and navigation systems, these sensors can better monitor mechanical conditions (i.e. tire pressure, change in weight), in addition to other maintenance factors that might affect motor functions like braking and handling.

While such sensors and sensor fusion algorithms may help achieve Vision Zero, several factors must be considered, the first of which is object classification. Current systems cannot achieve proper resolution required for object classification, but RADAR – given its micro-Doppler capabilities – is more capable in this area. Although currently a premium feature in autonomous vehicles, RADAR will become more common as the AEM (automatic emergency braking) mandate becomes a reality in the early 2020s.

LiDAR meanwhile is not a standard feature in cars today as it is not currently at the right cost or performance point to warrant broader adoption. Yet LiDAR will provide 10 times more image resolution than RADAR, which is needed to discern even more nuanced scenes. Getting to a high-quality solution –high-sensitivity with low dark current and low capacitance –is the key technology to enable the 1,500 nm LiDAR market, which may lead to its increased adoption. A key capability here is solid-state beam steering, as a high sensitivity, lower cost photodetector technology is needed to push the market to 1,500 nm. 

Image credit: Shutterstock

Image credit: Shutterstock

(Image: © Shutterstock)

Camera systems – common in new vehicles today – are a cornerstone to Level 2 autonomy. However, these systems do not work well under all use-cases (i.e. night and inclement weather). Ultimately, these perception technologies are needed to provide the most comprehensive data set to the systems that are designed to keep the vehicle occupant safe.

Though often overlooked, IMUs depend upon gravity, which is constant, regardless of environmental conditions. As such, they are very useful for dead-reckoning. In the temporary absence of a GPS signal, dead-reckoning uses data from sources such as the speedometer and IMUs to detect distance traveled and direction and overlays this data onto high-definition maps. This keeps a cognitive vehicle on the right trajectory until a GPS signal can be recovered. 

Sensor fusion can supplement the shortcomings of perception sensing systems. Required here is an intelligent balance between central and edge processing to drive data to the fusion engine. Cameras and LiDAR sensors provide excellent lateral resolution, but even the best machine learning algorithms require ~300 ms to make a lateral movement detection with sufficiently low false alarm rates. In today’s systems, ~10+ successive frames are needed for reliable detection with low-enough false alarm rates. This needs to be lowered to 1-2 successive frames to provide more time for the vehicle to take necessary evasive action.

New technology needs to be developed and brought forth—enabling advanced perception capabilities at high speeds—to support fully autonomous driving in both highway and city conditions. However, the more this is worked on, the more complex use cases will be identified that need to be addressed. Furthermore, inertial navigation will be a critical aspect of autonomous vehicles for the future, as these systems are impervious to environmental conditions and are needed to complement perception sensors, which can be impaired in certain situations.

The role of ADAS and full autonomy

Another major, non-technical factor one must consider in the goal of achieving Vision Zero is finding a balance between what technology can do and what legislation will allow.

Currently, industry leaders follow two tracks: advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS) and fully-autonomous vehicles. While the automotive industry feels more assured about ADAS than fully-autonomous vehicles, ADAS technology is still not perfect. 

OEMs and Tier 1 automotive suppliers are currently focused on Level 2 or Level 3 autonomy, as they view these as good business opportunities. Legislation associated with highly-autonomous vehicles isn’t firm yet, and other areas such as insurance and regulations need to be further explored to put a proper framework in place. Robo-taxis, for example, are poised for debut in several US cities. These vehicles will likely be on top of broader Level 2 or Level 3 applications already in place.

Much more work is also needed to improve the performance of specific sensing technologies like radar and LiDAR, and various algorithms that actuate automobiles and conditions. When we get to 2020 and beyond, where AEB becomes more of a standard feature in cars, is where we formally start shifting to Level 3 autonomy. However, further improvements are required to get from where automakers are today to where they would need to be to achieve this.

Image credit: Shutterstock

Image credit: Shutterstock

(Image: © Shutterstock)

OEMs really embrace the two-track dynamic. For example, with robo-taxis, they are considering that the economics of this business is entirely different from mass market automotive, as it embodies ride-sharing services. One of the other dynamics within that specific market enables OEMs to place advanced technology in these vehicles to mature hardware, software, and the sensor fusion framework. Even though OEMs have more faith in ADAS, seen more often are instances where they have created separate companies to take greater levels of vehicle autonomy into account. However, there are also OEMs that do not have research and development capital to follow this course, instead partnering with other companies that specialize in autonomous driving technologies.

In the middle of this two-track system lies Level 3+ autonomy. Though not fully autonomous, Level 3+ is more advanced than existing ADAS systems and combines premium performance features with practical functions. Although much higher performance sensors are needed to support Level 3+ applications, such as full speed highway autopilot and AEB+, when the vehicle not only brakes, but also swerves to avoid an accident. Level 3+ features highly autonomous technologies, including a critical sensor framework that lays the foundation for future fully autonomous vehicles. 

Although we are not at the point of full autonomy, Level 3+ automation gets us closer towards achieving the goal of Vision Zero as it balances practicality and performance, combining developments from the two tracks to develop a safe transportation ecosystem. This is the inflection point where autonomous technology becomes much more capable and available to the public.

Journey to Vision Zero

Regardless of industry leaders’ different approaches toward reaching Vision Zero, a diversity of high-performance perception and navigation sensors help get us there. Additionally, high-quality data generated from these sensors helps ensure decision-making software makes the correct decision – every time. The journey to Vision Zero and full autonomy follow the same road. Any player in the ecosystem must keep that top of mind in the coming years given the goal of autonomous vehicle development is to usher in a new technological and business model era, as well as save lives.

Chris Jacobs, Vice President of Autonomous Transportation and Automotive Safety at Analog Devices 

Go to Source

Samsung Galaxy Note 10 range could land on August 10, but without a key upgrade

Given that the last few Galaxy Note phones all landed in August it was always likely the Samsung Galaxy Note 10 would too, but we now have an idea of the exact date, as a source points to August 10.

That date comes from ETNews, but we’d take it with a side of salt, as it has a mixed track record and it’s not clear where it got the information from. That’s also a Saturday, which seems an odd choice.

However, ETNews is a South Korean site, so depending on what country Samsung announces the Note 10 range in, it’s possible the announcement could come on August 9 for much of the world, but August 10 for South Korea, due to the time difference. And the Galaxy Note 9 landed on August 9 last year, so that could well be the case.

In other Note 10 news, Max Weinbach (who has a reasonable track record) has said that according to his source the Galaxy Note 10 Pro will only have 25W charging. While that’s reasonably fast, it’s slower than previous rumors had suggested, with an earlier leak putting it as high as 45W.

We’re not sure which claim is right, but it would be disappointing if Samsung doesn’t up the speed, given that some rivals already offer more than 25W.

Finally, case renders have leaked for both the Samsung Galaxy Note 10 and Galaxy Note 10 Pro. Shared on SlashLeaks, they match previous leaked renders, showing a single-lens punch-hole camera on the front, hardly any bezel, and vertically-aligned rear cameras, with three lenses for the Note 10 and four for the Note 10 Pro.

These too we’d take with a pinch of salt, especially as they might just be based on the previous leaks, but at the moment no sources seem to be disagreeing with this design.

Via Softpedia and PocketNow

Go to Source

Google is limiting ad-blockers in Chrome, but Opera and Vivaldi won’t follow suit

Google is planning to revamp its extensions system in a way that will break several popular ad-blockers, but the developers of several other Chromium-based browsers (including Vivaldi, Opera and Brave) have announced that they won’t be following its lead.

According to ZDNet, all three companies have confirmed that they won’t be making the same API changes, despite being based on the same open source code base.

The update to Chrome’s application programming interface (API), known as Manifest V3, was announced in October 2018, but it wasn’t until January 2019 that its implications for extensions started to become clear.

You shall not pass

Ad-blockers including Ghostery and uBliock Origin rely on Chrome’s webRequest API, which allows them to block ads before they’re downloaded. Under Manifest V3, this feature will be deprecated, effectively breaking the blockers.

“Chrome is deprecating the blocking capabilities of the webRequest API in Manifest V3, not the entire webRequest API (though blocking will still be available to enterprise deployments),” explained extensions developer advocate, Simeon Vincent.

If you want to stick with your favorite ad-blocker, it could be time to switch to an alternative Chromium-based browser, or even something with a completely different codebase like Firefox.

Go to Source

AMD Ryzen 9 3950X leak points to imminent reveal of 16-core gaming CPU

AMD does have a 16-core Ryzen 3000 processor in the wings ready to be revealed, the latest GPU rumor insists, and we’ll see it at the company’s big E3 launch event later today (alongside the full range of new Navi graphics cards).

At Computex, a couple of weeks back in May, we heard about AMD’s Ryzen 3rd Generation CPUs, but the chips unveiled topped out at the 12-core Ryzen 9 3900X, with the previously (quite strongly) rumored 16-core product being a no-show.

That was a disappointment for some folks, but it seems that rubbishing the 16-core speculation may have been premature, as a freshly leaked slide points to the existence of a Ryzen 9 3950X.

Spotted by Videocardz, the purported presentation slide bills the chip as the ‘world’s first 16-core gaming CPU’, and the website claims the authenticity of the slide has been confirmed.

And the specs are pretty jaw-dropping. The 3950X is allegedly a 16-core (32-thread) processor with a base clock of 3.5GHz, and a maximum boost of 4.7GHz. Not only that, the TDP is only 105W (the same as the aforementioned 3900X).

All in all, that’s pretty incredible – but as ever, this is still just a rumor, so we have to take it with substantial pinch of salt. Being capable of boosting to 4.7GHz in a 16-core chip is particularly impressive, but remember that this will be the maximum boost, likely across a core or two, as opposed to the boost you’ll be able to get across all 16-cores.

Pricey proposition?

Even so, if the 3950X does emerge with these specs, it’s going to be a tempting piece of hardware – although it will also likely be pretty pricey. AMD could ask up to a grand for this chip, if it exists – after all, the Threadripper 2950X, its 16-core high-end desktop offering, was launched at $899 (£849, AU$1,369). But then again, the 3950X is an (alleged) mainstream processor, not a Threadripper (although it could offer similar performance, if this rumored spec is true).

If it does turn out to be pricey, realistically, a lot of folks are going to settle for the Ryzen 9 3900X which will probably be a good deal cheaper – priced at $499 (about £395, AU$715) – and with its 12-cores, it’ll still be a blistering performer for high-end PC enthusiasts and gamers.

Also, on the gaming front, there’s the question of exactly how many cores you really need. Many games still aren’t so reliant on the CPU, and you’re perfectly fine with a quad-core chip, with the GPU doing much of the work – but for those games which do benefit from many-core processors, obviously these new top-end Ryzen offerings are going to be quite something.

At least we don’t have to wait long to find out whether the 3950X does indeed exist, as we’ll know one way or another in not much more than 12 hours’ time. So stay tuned – we’ve got the full lowdown on how to watch AMD’s Next Horizon Gaming E3 2019 livestream.

Via Wccftech

Go to Source