How to apply for car tax online

When it comes to taxing your vehicle, you don’t need to head to the Post Office and join the queues of people, although you still can if you prefer. The DVLA also offers the ability to apply for your tax disc from the comfort of your own home by using the online form. We show you how.

Note that as of October 2014, the paper tax disc was abolished so you won’t receive a new on in the post. To tax your vehicle, you’ll need a reference number from one of the following documents:

  • A recent reminder (V11) or ‘last chance’ warning letter from DVLA
  • Vehicle log book (V5C) – must be in your name
  • Green ‘new keeper’s details’ slip (V5C/2) from a log book if you’ve just bought it

You can also use the online portal to perform a DVLA car tax check and other things like SORN your vehicle. If you don’t want to use the online form then the DVLA car tax phone number is 0300 123 4321.

Apply for a tax disc online

Step one

You’ll need to start by opening the DVLA’s dedicated vehicle online services page

Step two

Click the green ‘Start Now’ button and follow the instructions. You’ll need to use the 16 digit reference number from your V11 if possible.

Step three

Next you’ll need to confirm you’re the registered owner of the vehicle. If you have a valid MOT certificate and the vehicle is insured.

Step four

Make sure you follow the instructions to finish your application and make a payment for your car tax. You can choose whether you want to pay for 6- or 12 months of tax.

Remember you won’t get a tax disc in the post any more, so once you’re application is complete and successful you can jump in your car and go for a drive without worry.


Go to Source

GoDaddy expels neo-Nazi site over article on Charlottesville victim

Web hosting company GoDaddy has given a US neo-Nazi site 24 hours to find another provider after it disparaged a woman who died in protests in Virginia.

The Daily Stormer published a piece denigrating Heather Heyer, who was killed on Saturday after a car rammed into a crowd protesting at a white supremacist rally in Charlottesville.

GoDaddy had faced calls to remove the white supremacist site as a result.

The web host said the Daily Stormer had violated its terms of service.

“We informed the Daily Stormer that they have 24 hours to move the domain to another provider, as they have violated our terms of service,” GoDaddy said in a statement on Twitter.

Previously, some web users had called on GoDaddy to remove the site – including women’s rights campaigner Amy Siskind.

Violence broke out in Charlottesville, Virginia, after white supremacists organised a controversial far-right march called “Unite the Right”.

Since the announcement, a blog post has appeared on the Daily Stormer, claiming the site has been hacked by Anonymous.

However, the main Twitter feed for Anonymous has said it has no confirmation that the hacker group is involved.

More to follow…

Go to Source

Longterm Review: Venom BlackBook Zero 14

We’ve been seeing Venom laptops come across our labs testbench for a few years now, and we really like the company’s commitment to useful specs and build quality. But we’ve never really doubled down to see what the company’s laptops are like to use longterm.

Until now.

We reviewed Venom’s BlackBook Zero 14 back in February, and we liked what we saw back then. It’s a slim, yet sturdy, and remarkably versatile thanks to a replaceable battery and upgradeable SSD. But what’s it like to actually take out on the road?

Apples and Oranges

I travel a fair bit, and my usual go-to device when I’m on the road is an iPad Air paired with a Belkin keyboard case. It’s very light, great for content creation – if I’m not writing for work, I’m writing for my own projects – and has an array of very functional apps and even games. Not that I play that much when I’m travelling; I’m either too busy working, or too busy seeing the sights!

I’ve often thought that this is just about the ideal device for travel, so was curious to see how a more fully-featured, proper laptop would stack up.

Generally, using the Zero 14 for the last six months has been a real pleasure. It’s travelled from to Poland and Moscow on two separate long-haul trips, and been toted on a couple of bus-strips down to Canberra in that time, as well as lugged around Sydney itself to various work events – and the odd bar for some serious writing time. The slim 14mm chassis may be heavier not only than my usual iPad setup, but also many other ultraportables, but what it lacks in terms of thinness and lightness, it makes up in sheer durability. There simply isn’t a single scratch on the Zero 14’s alloy body.

The tapering shape of the notebook’s also great for travellers constantly forced to remove their laptop for airport security checks, as it easily slides back into your luggage once you’ve passed through. It’s a little thing, but one I really appreciated.

Less cool, though, is the matte body’s tendency to pick up fingerprints and other marks from use. It’s better than a glossy finish, by a long-shot, but much harder to keep clean.

Content with creation

I’ve written tens of thousands of words on the Zero 14, and I have to say it’s keyboard has been a real pleasure, accurate for touch-typing and responsive. The backlit keys make for easy typing in low-lit bars or darkened air-craft cabins, too, which is definitely a plus, and the matte-finish 1920 x 1080 display is as clear in the dark or even in daylight, making it easy to work no matter where you are. The colours are a little muted, but not in any way that detracts either from professional use, or watching videos. The speakers, though, are unsurprisingly not all useful – they make a good effort, but most people will happily switch over to headphones. And if you’re on the go, anyway, that’s pretty much the default usage scenario.

The touchpad does everything you’d expect, with one exception – it’s placed a touch too far to the left, at least for the way I type, which means I commonly trigger the mouse with the heel of my left hand while typing, which is a touch annoying, but not exactly a deal breaker.

Also slightly annoying is the Zero 14’s slightly dodgy wireless reception. It’s mostly solid, but it does occasionally lose its connection for no reason, when other devices – my Galaxy smartphone or iPad – has zero issues maintaining a connection. Given I work on Google Docs a lot when I travel, it can be a little frustrating if I haven’t saved a file offline – which is an easy enough habit to get into.

On the upside, the laptop’s battery is really quite solid. With heavy usage, I could get eight to ten hours out of the Zero 14, and multi-day uptime with irregular use and careful battery management. It’s more than capable of lasting for most legs of an international flight, which is great if you’re travelling on an aircraft without back-of-seat charging.

On top of that, the Zero 14 comes with two charging bricks, which means you can have one at home, and one at the office, or at least always have a backup if you do lose one while on the road. It’s a nice touch.

About the only ongoing lack that I felt between my iPad and the Zero 14 was the touchscreen. If you’d told me a few years ago I would have come to rely upon tapping on the screen while creating or editing a document, I would have laughed, but here I am, still finding myself absently tapping away at the Zero’s display, and spending a moment wondering why the cursor isn’t responding. A touch display may be out of the question given the Zero 14’s very competitive price point, but it was still something I missed.

Longterm Verdict

In a testing situation like this, about the best metric is this: would I keep using the product once the test is over?

Well, to put it simply, I’m not looking forward to packing up the Zero 14. It’s been a reliable machine through a mess of air-miles. It’s been great to work and write on, delivering a fine mix of sturdy reliability and the kind of style that means you feel a little proud pulling it out to work on in an airport bar.

Would I keep using the Zero 14? Absolutely.

Go to Source

Review: Review: Microsoft Surface Pro laptop

Another year, another release of the Surface Pro. This time, the most obvious change is the lack of a number on the end of the name – Surface Pro 5? Nobody here by that name.
Take a good look at the new Surface Pro, and it becomes apparent why the whole “generational update” thing has been played-down. At first glance, the new SP is identical to the SP4. 

External differences are subtle. The cooling vent around the top edge is no longer broken by little struts or vanes. The stand folds back further, allowing the tablet to lay almost flat on the desk. There’s an extra sensor beside the camera. And that’s about it. For the real changes, we need to go inside that slim-but-still-angular case.

This review unit is top-of-the-line in all specs except storage. It has the i7-7660U which can hit 4.0GHz, 16GB RAM and 512GB of storage on a NVMe SSD. So that’s a Kaby Lake dual-core CPU, faster SSD, and also more powerful integrated graphics via Intel’s Iris Plus 540.

Normally at this point, we’d note how the new CPU has a smaller fabrication process, and better TDP, and how this means the new Surface Pro runs cooler and quieter and gets better battery life.

But the Kaby Lake CPUs are 14nm just like Skylake, and the i7 has the same TDP of 15W. Indeed, performance increases are all about graphics – but that improvement is substantial. 

The simplest way to put it is to say the new Surface Pro performs about as well as the Surface Book, which has an Nvidia GeForce GTX 965M… and only when docked to the keyboard.

Of course, get into a heavy Witcher 3 session, and the Surface Pro will ramp up its fan to reduce thermal load.

It will also reduce CPU clock – Microsoft says performance can drop by up to 20% under heavy thermal load. And does that little fan roar? Oh yes, it roars.

But it roars to a lesser degree than we found even with the i5 version of the Surface Pro 4. That little beast is quite outspoken, in that just 15 minutes or so of YouTube or data crunching will make it start hissing away…

The good news for owners of the new i5 Surface Pro, is that a redesign of the thermal system allows the machine to run fanless. Hurrah for progress!

Other changes are even more subtle. The new chips support a wider colour space, and an enhanced colour mode for the otherwise identical display. There’s also that extra sensor next to the camera, which boosts the response speed of Windows Hello.

The new Type Cover keyboard loses the Insert key, but is otherwise difficult to tell apart from the fourth-gen version.

It all adds up to a solid upgrade over the SP4, but as long as Microsoft still offers the older machine, this next-gen flagship might remain a difficult sell.

This is a premium ultraportable with a premium price. As-tested, the 512GB, i7 Surface Pro costs a positively face-melting $3,299. And that’s without Surface Pen or Type Cover. Yes, you get much better graphics and a few display tweaks, but great as these improvements are, do they add up to the $538 premium over the equivalent i7 SP4 ($2761)? This writer humbly submits: aw HELL no.

As with any Surface release, we encountered the usual issues around connecting to an external 4K screen (running at true 4K was… difficult) and other oddities like the left-click function disappearing after the machine was left on overnight.

Updates are coming thick and fast, and to be fair we’ve had far fewer than the traditional number of “crash on sleep” or “crash on screen rotation” bugs that plagued other Surfaces for the first few weeks.

Subjectively, the biggest improvement we’ve found is the way the SP runs quieter for everyday work. Yes, it’s louder when gaming (and it actually plays games, so there’s that too), but for work and even a little Netflix, the fan stays either off or well below audible levels.

Apart from that, the new Surface Pro is the same shape and weight as the SP4. It has the same display (with slightly better graphics) and it performs the same except for graphics. It costs a lot more. Oh, and it supports the Surface Dial.

This means it’s still the best Windows “tablet” you can buy, and if you don’t mind the form factor, the best ultraportable PC.

But the price premium is very steep.

Go to Source

Microsoft rejects reports that Surface devices are unreliable

Consumer Reports, an independent nonprofit and consumer research group, has withdrawn its ‘recommended’ status for Microsoft’s Surface range of laptops and tablets, citing poor reliability within the first two years of ownership.

The influential research group released a report on Friday that said the site could no longer recommend that users should purchase Surface devices, including the Surface Laptop, Surface Pro 4 and Surface Book.

In reliability tests of Microsoft devices using detachable keyboards, it was found that 25% of laptops and tablets would present owners with issues, including breakages and technical faults, within two years of purchase.

Microsoft defended its Surface range in a statement to Consumer Reports, which said: “Microsoft’s real-world reutrn and support rates for past models differ significantly from Consumer Reports’ breakage predictability.”

“We don’t believe these findings accurately reflect Surface owner’s true experiences or capture the performance and reliability improvements made with every Surface generation.”

The Consumer Reports National Research Centre surveys millions of subscribers every year, asking readers to rate products based on their performance over time, rather than an initial hands on review.

The Microsoft survey collected data on 90,741 laptops and tablets that subscribers bought new between 2014 and 2017. A number of respondents reported experiencing startup issues, frequent unexpected crashes, machine freezes and unresponsive touchscreens.

“Consumers tell us that reliability is a major factor when they’re choosing a tablet or laptop,” said Simon Slater, survey manager at Consumer Reports. “And people can improve their chances of getting a more dependable device by considering our brand reliability findings.”

Although the Surface range performed similarly well during Consumer Report lab tests, the group found that performance degraded noticeably over time.

Specific examples included the 128GB and 256GB versions of the Surface Laptop and the 512GB version of the Surface Book.

This is not the first time the Surface range has faced reliability issues. The Surface Pro, Pro 2 and Pro 3 all suffered from a fault with their power cables that forced a product recall in 2016.

This article originally appeared at itpro.co.uk

Go to Source

Corsair HX1200 PSU Review

Given Corair’s highly successful RMx power supplies, which lack the digital interface found on all RMi models and use a different fan to bring costs down, the company thought to do something similar with its high-end HXi family. But instead of naming the new line HXx, which would have looked strange, Corsair simply removed the letter “i.” After all, there was already a portfolio of HX PSUs. Now it’s revamped with new members.

The HX line-up includes four models with capacities ranging from 750W to 1200W. The biggest difference between Corsair’s HXi and HX models, besides the latter’s lower price, is the lack of software control/monitoring, since a digital interface circuit is missing from the HX family. Both the HXi and HX PSUs use the same 135mm FDB fan. It’s incredibly quiet, even at high speeds, so we expect these lower-cost models to still feature great acoustic profiles under any circumstance.

Apparently not every enthusiast wants a power supply with digital circuits. Some have no intention of connecting their PSU and motherboard, believing that simpler is often better. This also gets around an extra installation step, even if it’s just one cable and some extra software.

According to Corsair, the HX1200i and HX1200 we’re reviewing today are separated by only $10. We figured the HX1200 would be significantly less expensive, making it more attractive. But that tiny delta compels us to lean towards the HX1200i, frankly. The only HX model with a notably lower price tag than its HXi equivalent is the HX750, which costs $30 less.

At least all of the HX units are similarly modular, with the ability to toggle between one and multiple +12V rails through a switch on the PSU’s rear panel (where the modular cables plug in).

The same warranty that covers Corsair’s highest-end PSUs also applies to the HXes, giving you 10 years of protection. With the cryptocurrency craziness in full swing, we expect a lot of HX units to power mining rigs operating at nearly full load continuously. Under such harsh conditions, a 10-year warranty could prove catastrophic if RMAs start rolling in at an accelerated rate. We don’t think any power supply will last for prolonged periods of time under the kind of duress that mining imposes. We’ve even heard that some companies are thinking about cutting their coverage if a PSU is used for mining, though we’re not sure how they plan to prove this.

Specifications

Corsair’s HX1200 achieves a Cybenetics ETA-B rating and an 80 PLUS Gold certification. When it comes to noise, it is LAMBDA-A+-rated, indicating very quiet operation. The list of protection features is thorough; Corsair even offers OCP at +12V through a switch, located on the back of the PSU.

The 135mm cooling fan uses a fluid dynamic bearing, so it should last quite a while. In a PSU backed by a hefty 10-year warranty, the fan has to be super reliable.

A 20cm depth makes this a long PSU, indeed.

Power Specifications

Rail 3.3V 5V 12V 5VSB -12V
Max. Power Amps 30 30 100 3.5 0.8
Watts 150 1200 17.5 9.6
Total Max. Power (W) 1200

The minor rails boast an impressive 150W of maximum combined power, while the +12V rail can deliver up to 100A if needed, handling the PSU’s full power on its own. Lastly, the 5VSB rail is also quite strong with 17.5W capacity. We like to see 1kW+ PSUs with beefy 5VSB circuits.

In the multi-+12V rail mode, there are eight +12V rails with 40A maximum current output each. All of the rails combined can deliver the same wattage (1200W) in single-rail mode, of course.

Cables & Connectors

Modular Cables
Description Cable Count Connector Count (Total) AWG
ATX connector 20+4 pin (600mm) 1 1 16-20
4+4 pin EPS12V (650mm) 2 2 18
6+2 pin PCIe (670mm+100mm) 4 8 16-18
SATA (450mm+115mm+115mm+115mm) 3 12 18
SATA (450mm+110mm+110mm+110mm) 2 8 18
Four-pin Molex (450mm+100mm+100mm+100mm) 2 8 18
FDD Adapter (+100mm) 1 1 20

There are two EPS connectors along with eight PCIe ones, all available at the same time. The number of SATA connectors is huge, while the eight four-pin Molex connectors should cover every need. Some miners would probably ask for 10 or 12 PCIe connectors, but Corsair obviously didn’t have a cryptocurrency boom in mind when the HX1200 was being designed.

Power Distribution

As mentioned, there is a switch that lets you choose between one +12V rail or multiple ones. In the HXi models, this is achieved using the Corsair Link software. However, since the HX models don’t have a digital interface, a different approach had to be used.

The +12V rails can deliver up to 40A each if the multi-rail mode is selected. According to Corsair, each individual connector in this PSU has over-current protection, so no more than 40A goes through any given cable.

MORE: Best Power Supplies

MORE: How We Test Power Supplies

MORE: All Power Supply Content

Go to Source

AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Unboxing

Go to Source